Search Results for "possession delay"

3843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application for Annulment Filed 21 Years After Act Commencement and 30 Years After Transaction Deemed Unreasonable Despite Absolute Alienation Bar Under Rule 43(8) of Mysore Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning land originally granted to a Scheduled Caste beneficiary in 1941 under the Mysore Land Revenue Code....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioner-Society's Grievance of Non-Conveyance of Entire Land Rejected as Delay of Over 7 Years Unexplained.

The petitioner, Jalaram Ashish Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 7 October 2015 passed by the Compet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Sole Eyewitness Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconsistent.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Limo Cortez, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...