Search Results for "ownership period"

3217 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3217 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Writ Petitions Concerning Eviction from Railway Public Premises. City Civil Court's Order Upholding Eviction but Reducing Damages to Rs.3,125 per Month Was Under Challenge Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India and Public Premises Act, 1971.

The dispute arose from the allotment of premises admeasuring 875 sq.ft. at the Administrative Building, Central Railway, Mumbai to the Central Railway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Title — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Compromise Decree and Mutation Entries. The court held that failure to consider crucial evidence renders findings perverse and warrants remand under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession based on title filed by the original plaintiff (respondent No. 1) against the original def...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Land Already Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Claim of Possession Since 1954 Fails as Land Vested in Airport Authority After Acquisition in 1947-48.

The petitioners, heirs of Mohan Bhika Rathod, filed a writ petition challenging an eviction order passed by the Estate Officer under the Public Premis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Proved and Time Not Essence. Plaintiff failed to establish execution of agreement for sale and readiness and willingness to perform, leading to dismissal of suit for specific performance.

The appellant, Shaikh Hidayat, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of property admeasuring about 11920 sq. mtrs. at Borda, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricket Association. Court holds that lease of public property at nominal rent for promoting sports is not arbitrary and is a valid policy decision.

The petitioners, including Aam Aadmi Party and individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...