Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holding That Defendant No. 2 Failed to Establish Adverse Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Set Aside Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts and Remanded the Matter for Fresh Consideration on the Issue of Adverse Possession.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff (Sitaram) against defendants no. 1 (Pandharinath) and no. 2 (Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Orders in PASA Cases for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as authorities failed to consider bail orders and conditions, rendering subjective satisfaction invalid.

The petitioner, Kashyapbhai Rameshbhai Kotecha, filed multiple Special Civil Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Court upholds concurrent findings of courts below that appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) over a piece of land in Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Upholding Plaintiff's Title and Rejecting Adverse Possession Claim. Defendant's possession held permissive, not hostile; civil court jurisdiction not barred under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The plaintiff, Rajesh Parasram Shahu, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 1778/1993 for possession of Plot No. 88 at Khasra No.4/5, Gat No.78, admeasuring 80...