WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019
19 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "disputed correspondence"
1231 result(s) found
Found 1231 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Implementation of De-hiring Policy for Defence-Occupied Premises. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to enforce de-hiring policy against Union of India for flats occupied since 1944 under lease agreements.
29 Aug 2005The petitioners, Kaikobad Byramjee and Son (Agency) Private Limited and Mr. Khushrooh P. Byramjee, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Cou...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Steamer Agent's Challenge to Port Trust's Demurrage Claim — Agent Held Liable for Unpaid Port Dues Despite Acting for Foreign Principal. The court affirmed that a steamer agent is personally liable for port charges when the principal is a foreign entity not amenable to Indian jurisdiction.
16 Dec 2005The petitioner, Forbes Forbes Campbell & Co. Ltd., was the steamer agent for American President Lines Ltd., a foreign shipping company. Seven cartons ...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Accused in MCOCA Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Warrant Issued Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Considering That Accused Was Not Absconding. The Court held that issuance of warrant under Section 70 CrPC requires satisfaction that accused is absconding or will not obey summons, and the Special Court under MCOC Act cannot issue warrant mechanically.
22 Feb 2005The petitioner, Prakash Rasiklal Dhariwal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the non-bailable warrant issued against his father, Rasiklal Dha...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Petitions Against Co-operative Appellate Court Order in Recovery Dispute Between State-Owned Corporation and Co-operative Bank. Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Liability and Interest, Holding That Co-operative Court Has Jurisdiction Over Recovery Claims Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
8 Feb 2005The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions challenging an order of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court dated 28.9.2004 in Revisi...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Price of Goods Sold and Delivered in Suit for Recovery of Money. Plaintiff supplier entitled to principal amount of Rs.52,747.63 with interest at 6% p.a. from date of suit till realization.
24 Jun 2005The plaintiff, a supplier of handwoven cotton fabrics, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.66,462.01/- with further interest on the principal amount of Rs...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.
23 Jan 2013The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.
13 Feb 2013The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Share Acquisition Dispute — Arbitration Clause Invoked for Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement and a dispute regarding payment of Rs.1.5 Crores under the share acquisition agreements dated 14th October 2009 entitled the applicants to appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Mar 2013The applicants, Bharat Kantilal Bussa and Rita Bharat Bussa, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs.81.33 Lakhs — Appellant Granted Leave to Defend on Deposit of Rs.50 Lakhs. The court held that the Appellant had raised triable issues but the condition of deposit was justified given his role as CFO and Executive Director in authorizing the payment.
3 Apr 2013The appeal was filed by the First Defendant (Jayesh Nagindas Doshi) against an order of the learned Single Judge in a summary suit under Order XXXVII ...
- 124
