Search Results for "Seized Money"

1747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal and Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Lapse in Confession Recording. Victim's Mental Incapacity and Police Influence Over Accused's Confession Under Section 164 CrPC Lead to Benefit of Doubt.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dhiraj Murari Warkar from the charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Examines Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC — Judgment Incomplete. Accused's Extra-Judicial Confession to Social Worker and Circumstantial Evidence Assessed Without Final Determination.

The appeal arose from a sessions trial where the accused, a practising lawyer, was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Notice of Motion in MOFA-MMRDA Dispute. Flat Purchasers Claimed MOFA Rights on Land Owned by MMRDA and Leased to Developer, Which Respondents Disputed as Excluded Under MMRDA Act.

This appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from the dismissal of a Notice of Motion by a learned Single Judge in a suit concerning a plot of land ...