Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim Over Stilt Parking Spaces. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation that development agreement did not grant developer right to sell stilt car parking lots.

The petitioner, M/s. M. Mamotra Associates, a developer, entered into a Development Agreement dated 20 February 2006 with the respondent, Leela Raj 'A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Specific Performance Suit — No Right, Title or Interest in Suit Property at Time of Agreement. Subsequent purchaser/developer not entitled to be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as decree would bind them.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a chamber summons filed by M/s Space Developer, a registered partnership firm, seeking impleadment as a party defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Income Tax Deduction and Revision Case. The court considered whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80I and whether the Tribunal correctly sustained the CIT's revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Vijay Udhyog, a part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 1977 Despite Limitation and Forgery Challenges. Executor Succeeds in Proving Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity of Testator Who Died in 1979.

The plaintiff, Suresh Manilal Mehta, filed a petition for probate of a Will dated 16th March 1977 allegedly executed by Rameshchandra Jamnadas Dalal (...