Search Results for "removal before term"

1488 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1488 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Hears PIL Challenging Goa's 2023 Dump Policy Clause 2(2) Permitting Dump Mining Without Auction or Lease. Petition Also Challenges Approvals Granted to Ex-Lessee Without Auction or Mining Lease, Claiming Violation of MMDR Act 1957 and Constitutional Norms for Resource Disposal.

The Goa Foundation, an environmental NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging Clause 2(2) of the Policy For Regulating Iron Ore Dump Handli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Deposit and Injunction — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief as Trustee Failed to Establish Breach of Trust or Impairment of Security Under Trust Deed and Information Memorandum.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Abuse Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 354 IPC and Goa Children's Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shri Kanhaiya Naik, was convicted by the Children's Court of Goa at Panaji in Special Case No. 24 of 2012 for offences under Section 35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Bank's Writ Petition Against Sales Tax Tribunal's Refusal to Entertain Appeal Under Section 55 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Tribunal Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits

The petitioner, Shikshak Sahakari Bank Limited, a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...