Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand soon before death.

The case pertains to the death of Shaheen, who was married to Abdul Aziz (accused No. 2) on 12th April 1996. After marriage, she resided with her husb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 dismissed as no part of cause of action arose within court's jurisdiction.

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. Criminal Application No.1678 of 2010 was filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines for Premature Release of Life Convict in Murder During Robbery Case. Petitioner's Offence of Murder During Robbery Correctly Categorized Under Category 5(a) of the 1992 Guidelines, Which Superseded the 1978 Guidelines.

The petitioner, Harjeetsingh Niranjansingh Jabbal, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for murder committed during a rob...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Spouses — Section 482 CrPC. Settlement Reached Between Husband and Wife Leads to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner, Vaibhav Sukram Chaudhari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Quash FIR Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Due to False Allegations and Malicious Prosecution. The court quashed the FIR as the allegations were found to be false and motivated, and the wife had made contradictory statements.

The petitioner, Sangeeta Santosh Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.

The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Ministers from Exercising President's Constitutional Powers. Court holds that the President exercises executive powers on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 74 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, P.B. Samant, claiming to be an active social worker, filed a public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Deletion of Name from Town Planning Scheme — Arbitrator's Order for Possession Upheld. Deletion of Petitioner's Name from Final Plot No.746/2 in Town Planning Scheme No.1, Shrirampur, Held Illegal and Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Suresh Devikisan Oza, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the deletion of his name from ...