Search Results for "declared value"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "declared value"

3327 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3327 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not re-hearing the appeal.

27 Aug 2018

The judgment pertains to a review application filed by the appellants in First Appeal No. 620 of 1996, seeking review of the judgment and order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Are Invalid. The court held that reassessment under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be completed within four years from the end of the relevant tax period, and notices issued after that period are barred by limitation.

31 Aug 2018

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of a single judge quashing reassessment notices issued under Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Lease Premium Paid by Tenant to Landlord for Surrender of Tenancy Rights is a Capital Expenditure, Not Revenue Expenditure. The premium paid to vacate the premises and surrender tenancy rights is capital in nature, not deductible as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Jul 2015

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, aga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Modifies Trial Court's Decree on Self-Acquired Properties. The court upheld the trial court's finding on joint family property but excluded certain items from partition due to lack of evidence of jointness.

21 Jul 2015

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (daughters and widow) against the appellants (sons) for partition of suit schedule propert...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition of Joint Family Properties Except for Certain Items. The court held that the presumption of jointness in a Hindu family continues until rebutted, and the appellants failed to prove that the properties were self-acquired.

21 Jul 2015

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (daughters and mother) against the appellants (sons) seeking partition of joint family pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Returning Plaint in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Court Fee Valuation Determines Jurisdiction, Not Market Value of Property. Dispute pertained to suit for possession and mesne profits where trial court ordered return of plaint for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction based on market value, but High Court held that under Section 7(v) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, court fee is payable on the amount claimed as mesne profits, and jurisdiction is determined by that valuation.

7 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed by the defendants (M/s Vasudeva Rao & Sons and its partner) challenging a common order dated 12.3....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Disposes Three Criminal Applications in Matrimonial Dispute Seeking Quashing of FIRs. Accusations Involve IPC, POCSO Act, and Juvenile Justice Act Allegations Between Family Members.

3 Jul 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with three interconnected proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute between a husband (Prakash Hotch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Multiple FIRs Under UP Conversion Act and IPC for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Procedural Non-Compliance. FIRs Filed by Third Party Not Authorized Under Unamended Section 4 of the Act and Vague Allegations of Fraud and Conversion Do Not Constitute Offences; Court Emphasizes Misuse of Criminal Machinery and Importance of Protecting Religious Freedom.

1 Jan 1970

The present batch of matters comprised three writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution and nine appeals by special leave against orders of t...

104 105 106 107 108

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)