Search Results for "declaration decree"

3491 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3491 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The present second appeal arises out of a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiffs (now appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The appellant failed to prove title and possession, and no substantial question of law was raised.

The case involves a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2006 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...