Search Results for "Temporary Statute"

1174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Suit for Damages Against Foreign Company. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Contract and Cause of Action, Not by Place of Performance of Warranty Obligations.

The appellant, Kalyanji Walji Private Ltd., filed a suit for damages against Sortex Limited (a UK company), Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lease Rent Demand Against Indian Oil Corporation for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Collector's demand for arrears of lease rent for periods prior to 1995 set aside as time-barred and without authority under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, challenged a communication dated 14 March 2002 from the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District, demanding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy Jurisdiction Dispute — Plaint Returned to Small Causes Court. Court holds that the Small Causes Court has exclusive jurisdiction to try suits between landlord and tenant under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The appellant, Balwant Dattatraya Mule, filed a suit in the Civil Court claiming to be a tenant of residential premises and seeking reliefs against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Striking Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-compliance with interim orders under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 leads to striking off defence under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 4 October 2012, which allowed a motion under Order 39 Rule 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Stay of Civil Suit Pending Arbitration in Joint Venture Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Joint Venture Agreement Mandates Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s Eagle AgroFarm Private Limited, owned certain properties and entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 9 May 2006 with Responde...