Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1272 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1272 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitrator's Orders Refusing Additional Documents. Arbitrator's discretion to close evidence and reject additional documents upheld as not exceeding jurisdiction under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Radiant Infosystems Limited, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Demand Case Due to Inordinate Delay — 9-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Oppressive Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Eastern Agencies Aromatics (P) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank Executive in Cheque Dishonour Case — Donation Not a Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 138 NI Act. Court held that a cheque issued as a donation without existing liability does not attract penal provisions under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Sashidhar Jagdishan, an individual aged 79 years and an executive at HDFC Bank, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Allowing Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Inherent Power to Recall Witness Under Section 22 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, Deepak Kochhar and Rajeev Kochhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...