Search Results for "City Civil and Sessions Court"

1336 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1336 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Dispute — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Injunction Granted Without Proper Consideration of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.

The appellant, Sri Yathievendra Naik @ Yathish, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sk. Gulab @ Gulam s/o Sk. Ahemad, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his sister-in-law, Jaheda, under Section 302 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Possession Based on Valid Title and Lease Termination. Tenant's Claim of Ownership and Adverse Possession Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendants in O.S.No.1291/2013 against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer and Joint Trial of Case and Counter Case to Avoid Conflicting Judgments. Court Directs Committal of Magistrate's Case to Special Court Under Section 407 Cr.P.C. for Joint Trial with Counter Case Involving SC/ST Act Offences to Prevent Inconsistent Verdicts.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Hiremath, was the first informant in Crime No.200/2017 registered at Jayanagar Police Station against respondent Dr....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Contract Driver in Corruption Case — No Demand of Bribe by Non-Public Servant. Petitioner, a contract driver of BESCOM, was not a public servant under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and no demand of bribe was made by him.

The petitioner, Mr. Murali Krishna R., was a contract driver employed at the BESCOM Corporate Office in Bengaluru. He was arraigned as accused No.2 in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Cognizance Order in Corruption Case Against Retired IPS Officer — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court held that taking cognizance without valid sanction is illegal and proceedings are liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Dr. S. Krishnamurthy, a retired IPS officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P...