Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22069 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22069 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Default Bail in POCSO Case — Issues Framed on Section 193(2) BNSS. The Court Examines Whether Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Entitles Accused to Statutory Bail Despite 90-Day Limit Under Section 187(3)(i) BNSS.

The case arose from a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the BNSS, challenging orders denying de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Restoration Application in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Bajaj Auto Limited. Industrial Court's Rejection on Merits Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 19.01.2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad. The petitioners in Writ Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...