Search Results for "section 13(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "section 13(4)"

1545 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1545 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in CBI Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 120(B), 409, 467, 471, 477(A) IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove criminal conspiracy and dishonest misappropriation.

3 Jan 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Jitender Prasad Kaushik (A1), Raphael Joseph Manohar (A2), and another appellant (A3) against...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Composition Tax Case — Works Contract Not Eligible for Composition Under Section 15 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court held that once a dealer opts for composition under Section 15, the turnover attributable to works contract cannot be separately taxed under Section 4(1)(b) of the Act.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioner, M/s Suzlon Infrastructure Ltd. (subsequently known as M/s Synefra Engineering & Constructions Ltd. and presently as M/s Aspen Infrastr...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.

16 Jul 2026

The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...

High Court

KAHC010645132024_1

19 Dec 2025

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Wife Murder Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Relying on Circumstantial Evidence of Motive, Recovery, and Phone Calls.

25 Sep 2020

The appellant, Rupesh Radhakisan Chaudhari, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife, Jaishree, under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act — Guarantors' Liability Is Co-extensive with Principal Debtor, No Need to Exhaust Remedies Against Principal Debtor First

13 Apr 2005

The petitioner, M/s. SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed two petitions under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application to Refer Copyright Dispute to Arbitration — Term Sheet Contains Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court held that the arbitration agreement in the Term Sheet dated 13th June 2012 is valid and referred the disputes between the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Apr 2016

The Plaintiff, Eros International Media Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and other defendants, alleg...

103 104 105 106 107

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)