Search Results for "open delivery"

1877 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1877 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO.538 2005

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020

The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Upholds Use of Mediator and Counsellor Reports. Reports of Child Counsellor and Mediator Regarding Child's Behavior and Attitude Are Not Confidential Under Mediation Confidentiality Rules.

The appellant, Perry Kansagra, a Kenyan and British citizen, and the respondent, Smriti Madan Kansagra, an Indian citizen, married on 29 July 2007 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Conditions for Medical Equipment Supply. Court upholds requirement of prior experience in manufacturing/supply of medical equipment as essential condition in tender for procurement of medical equipment for government hospitals.

The petitioners, Health-O-Wonder Private Limited and Nashik Zilla Swayam Rojgar Berojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha’s Mahasangh, challenged the tender co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...