Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "exception period six years"
1701 result(s) found
Found 1701 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears State Appeal Against Acquittal of Six Accused for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149, 341 r/w 149, 120B r/w 149 IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Acquitted Accused Due to Contradictions in Eyewitness Testimony and Delay in Naming Accused 2-6; High Court Examines Whether Acquittal Is Perverse.
4 Jul 2017The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of six accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Sessions Case No. 53 of 1996...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Employer in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Labour Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 33C(2) Not Ousted by Minimum Wages Act, and Article 137 of Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Quasi-Judicial Tribunals. The Court Held That No Dispute Existed on Wage Rates, Rendering Section 20(1) of Minimum Wages Act Inapplicable, and Article 137 Governs Only Applications to Courts, Not Labour Courts.
20 Mar 1969The appeals arose from four writ petitions filed by the Town Municipal Council, Athani, before the High Court of Mysore, challenging orders of the Lab...
- 43
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.
17 Sep 2019The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...
- 353
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Custody of Victim to Believed Mother in Immoral Traffic Case — Emphasizes Victim's Welfare and Consent. Section 17(4) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 requires court to consider victim's wishes and suitability of guardian before ordering corrective institution.
11 Jul 2019The petitioner, Asiya Anwar Shaikh, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, which confirmed the orde...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Order Sending Victim to Corrective Institution in Immoral Traffic Case — Victim's Consent and Best Interest Not Considered. Father's Application Allowed; Victim to Be Released to Parental Custody.
17 Sep 2019The applicant, Nagar Macchindra Bhui, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order da...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 89
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Revenge Attack After Rejected Marriage Proposal. Section 307 IPC conviction sustained as victim's consistent testimony and medical evidence proved intention to cause death.
3 Aug 2012The appellant, Andre Fernandes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Panaji, Goa, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Ind...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.
30 Aug 2019The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...
- 132
