WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
Search Results for "common petition"
9230 result(s) found
Found 9230 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
6 Mar 2025Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...
- 578
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Period of Interim Stay Must Be Excluded Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the High Court erred in not excluding the period of interim stay while computing the two-year period for declaring the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and quashed the High Court's order that had declared the acquisition lapsed.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had qua...
- 174
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC — Petitioner Fails to Show Illegality or Irregularity in Trial Court Order. The revisional court cannot interfere with a well-reasoned order of maintenance unless it is perverse or illegal.
31 Jul 2018The petitioner, Mrs. Neelam Manmohan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.
10 Jun 2010This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case at Court Complex — Common Intention Established Under Section 149 IPC. Appellants convicted for murder and other offences based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, with no merit found in defence of false implication.
3 Sep 2019The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals against a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had upheld the conviction of the appella...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory; Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.
5 Mar 2015The judgment involves multiple criminal petitions filed by various individuals, including Mallu S/o Vittal Toravi and others, seeking quashing of crim...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claims — Tractor Owner Liable for Negligence Despite Driver's License. Insurer can recover compensation from owner if vehicle was driven without valid license, but third-party claimants entitled to payment.
25 Mar 2019The case involves four first appeals arising from motor accident claims. The accident occurred when a tractor driven by Dipak Kawale, owned by Praful ...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Law Officer Group B in Police Department — No Right to Appointment by Mere Participation in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Illegality in Appointment of Respondent No.3 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
8 Jun 2011The petitioner, Ms. Surekha Ragho Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a w...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.
24 Dec 2013The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...
- 81
