Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22050 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22050 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Reconveyance of Land Transferred for Electricity Sub-Station. Petitioner's claim of coercion and duress after ten years rejected as the transfer was a voluntary commercial transaction under a registered Deed of Transfer.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Goan Real Estate and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

9 Jun 2017

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Default Bail in POCSO Case — Issues Framed on Section 193(2) BNSS. The Court Examines Whether Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Entitles Accused to Statutory Bail Despite 90-Day Limit Under Section 187(3)(i) BNSS.

10 Apr 2026

The case arose from a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the BNSS, challenging orders denying de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Restoration Application in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Bajaj Auto Limited. Industrial Court's Rejection on Merits Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

19 Jan 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 19.01.2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad. The petitioners in Writ Pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

23 Aug 2013

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantees in Arbitration Dispute — No Case of Fraud or Irreparable Injury Established. Court held that bank guarantees are independent contracts and injunction can only be granted in exceptional circumstances of fraud or special equity, which were not made out.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Felguera Gruas India Pvt. Ltd. (FGIPL), filed six arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

8 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

19 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

103 104 105 106 107

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)