Search Results for "Binding Judgment"

7265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by Cotton Corporation Against Textile Mill for Unpaid Price of Imported Cotton. Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of suit till payment.

The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, a government undertaking and canalising agency for import of cotton, filed a suit for recovery of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Will Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Finding of Valid Will. Exclusion of Son from Inheritance Not Suspicious Where Testator Had Self-Acquired Property and Beneficiary Explained Circumstances.

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a Will executed by late Govindrao Ganpatrao Chimurkar, who died on 29.11.2002. The suit properties we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admissions Upheld. Court held that admissions must be clear and unequivocal for judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, and disputed questions of fact cannot be decided in such application.

The petitioner, who is the first defendant in a suit for partition and separate possession, filed a revision petition under Section 115 CPC challengin...