Search Results for "disclosure requirement"

1316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Reserved Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder. Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Recovery of Weapons Scrutinized Under Sections 302, 307, 120-B, 449, 143, 144, 147, 148 IPC.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Case of Murder and Attempted Murder Under IPC Sections 302, 307, 316. Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony of Wife and Brother-in-Law in Knife Attack at Public Place.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, jointly heard the Criminal Confirmation Case No. 02 of 2020 and Criminal Appeal No. 398 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Under Sections 364, 376(2)(f), and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Appeal Challenges Reliability of DNA Evidence and Last Seen Circumstances in Establishing Guilt.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Sessions Court for kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl. The prosecution case was that a missing rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court's Grant of Interim Protection from Arrest Under CGST Act. High Court Could Not Grant Protection from Arrest After Dismissing Pre-Arrest Bail Application as Not Maintainable, Applying Principles from Madan Gopal Rungta and Hema Mishra.

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal by the Union of India against a protective order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court had rejected t...