Search Results for "Tenant Revision"

1059 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1059 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Partner in Suit by Firm Despite Non-Compliance with Order 30 Rule 4 CPC — No Amendment of Plaint Required for Adding Partner as Co-Plaintiff. Partner of a firm can be added as co-plaintiff without amending plaint as firm is not a separate legal entity.

The appellant, Manohar Kashinath Vyawahare, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing his application for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a gala in Dhiraj Pen Compound, Andheri, filed a suit challenging a demolition notice dated 17 September 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's Liability.

The petitioners, Dena Bank and its manager, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 March 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Section 34 Arbitration Petition — Delay in Filing Amendment Not Fatal as Amendment Only Clarified Existing Grounds Without Causing Prejudice.

The petitioner, Inox Leisure Limited, challenged an order dated 07/09/2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Panaji, which allowed an amendment ...