Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LIC's Reduction in Gratuity Fund Policy Surrender Value. LIC's decision to pay 92.5% of cash accumulation upheld as consistent with policy terms and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, trustees of the Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Employees’ Gratuity Trust Fund, had taken out a group gratuity policy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defendant in Attachment Before Judgment Case — Failure to Prove Intent to Defeat Decree. Order 38 Rule 5 CPC Requires Clear Evidence of Intent to Obstruct Execution, Not Mere Threat to Sell Property.

The appeal was filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Leela Sudhir Alekar, against an order dated 3 February 2000 passed by the trial court allowing th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in PMGSY Contract — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action. Tender Cancellation Without Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Lowest Bidder's Rights Held Illegal Under Article 14 and 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, M/s. Mundhe Contractors, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the canc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Fair Price Shop Malpractice Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Complainant Not Heard. Revision Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Maharashtra Essential Commodities Act.

The petitioner, Dattatraya Marotrao Sakhare, was the original complainant who, along with other card holders from village Konatha, filed a complaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Reference Against Respondent for Alleged Scandalous Allegations Against Deputy Charity Commissioner. Statements Made at Press Conference Were Not Contemptuous as They Did Not Interfere with Administration of Justice and Were Made in Public Interest.

The case involves a reference under Section 15(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, made by Shri B.M. Khodade, the then Deputy Charity Commissioner...