Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty on Medicinal Preparation Containing Dextropropoxyphene. Product 'Lobain' Held Taxable Under M&TP Act Regardless of Dosage.

The petitioner, DWD Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged an order by Respondent No.5 which upheld earlier orders by Respondent No.4 and Respondent No.3, h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 835 OF 2022

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Entry Tax Provisions in Challenge by Importer of Goods. Section 3 of Goa Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 held valid as charging section need not contain measure of tax; machinery and penalty provisions also upheld.

The petitioner, M/s Pernod Ricard India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Three Revision Applications Challenging Order Framing Charge Under Section 409 IPC in Share Retention Case. High Court Restores Trial Court’s Discharge of Accused No.1 and No.4 and Charge Under Section 406 IPC Against Accused No.2.

The three criminal revision applications before the Bombay High Court arose out of a private complaint filed by Hari Narayan G. Bajaj against four acc...