Search Results for "Disciplinary proceeding"

1167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Primary Teacher Dismissed for Moral Turpitude and Bigamy. Departmental Enquiry Upheld Despite Criminal Acquittal as Standard of Proof Differs.

The petitioner, Rabhaji Ananda Kulange, was a primary teacher employed by the Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar since 6/7/1979. He was served a charge sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order Upholding Removal of Assistant Manager. Post of Assistant Manager was not an approved post in the staffing pattern, hence removal was justified under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Shyamsunder S/o Goverdhanji Heda, was employed as Assistant Manager at Dwarkadas Mantri Nagri Sahkari Bank Ltd., Beed (Respondent No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Termination of Employee Based on Conviction Despite Pending Appeal. Conviction Itself Is Sufficient Reasoning Under Rule 10(a) of Maharashtra State Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, and Suspension of Sentence Does Not Invalidate Termination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., challenged the orders of the courts below which directed the respondent, Pundalik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Departmental Inquiry During Pendency of Criminal Case. Held that departmental inquiry can proceed simultaneously with criminal trial as standards of proof differ, and no automatic stay arises from registration of criminal case.

The petitioner, Ramesh Sonawane, a Junior Manager with Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., was involved in a criminal case under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention by Police Officers. False Case Under Bombay Police Act Resulted in Discharge, but Court Found No Malafide Intent or Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Miss Veena Sippy, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, alleging...