Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3139 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Invocation of Bank Guarantee in Airport Development Contract Dispute. Court holds that bank guarantee is an independent contract and can be invoked only in case of breach, but no prima facie case of fraud or irretrievable injustice established.

29 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited (HDIL), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Decision of Authority Under Payment of Wages Act in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Classification. Bonus Awarded by Industrial Court Not 'Wages' Under Section 2(vi) as It Is Not Remuneration Payable Under Contract of Employment.

19 Mar 1958

The Supreme Court of India considered whether a bonus awarded by the Industrial Court, Bombay, to the operatives of Tata Mills Ltd. constituted 'wages...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Proceedings Under Industrial Disputes Act — Mamlatdar Cannot Execute Recovery Without Proper Adjudication of Individual Entitlement. The court held that Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is a mere recovery provision and does not confer power to adjudicate disputes regarding entitlement of workmen.

30 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Chowgule Industries Private Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging recovery proceedings initiated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Competent Authority's Order Under MOFA — Failure to Obtain Prior Consent of Landowners Renders Development Agreement Void. The court held that the Competent Authority under Section 9A of MOFA has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding prior consent, and the petitioners' failure to obtain such consent made the agreements void.

21 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Arenja Industries Limited and Akshar Construction, filed three writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Competent Authority un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Commercial Court’s Dismissal of Section 34 Petitions Upholding Arbitral Awards on Escalation Claims. Dispute Arises Out of Delays in Five Hospital Renovation Projects Undertaken by Contractor and Alleged Breach of Contract by Government Entities.

19 Sep 2024

The appellant, a contractor, was the successful bidder for 14 projects relating to the renovation and expansion of various government hospitals in Kar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

17 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Officer’s Endorsements Denying Compensation for Phot Kharab Lands, Directs Enquiry Under Rule 21(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. The Court held that classification as phot kharab does not automatically vest ownership in the State; the Land Acquisition Officer must ascertain whether the land falls under Rule 21(2)(a) or (b) before deciding compensation.

7 Mar 2023

Background: The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Upper Krishna Project, challenging the endors...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

4 Apr 2013

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Inputs Used in Exempted Goods, Partially Allows Revenue's Appeals on Education Cess. Tractors are exempted goods despite education cess, but separate accounts are required under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

4 Dec 2019

The judgment concerns multiple appeals filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Assessee) and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Revenue) against a co...

101 102 103 104 105

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)