WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...
Search Results for "disciplinary jurisdiction"
1807 result(s) found
Found 1807 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.
5 Jul 2021The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Welfare Fund Cess as Unconstitutional. Levy under Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 held to be a fee for services rendered, not a tax, and validly imposed on establishments including those with contract labour.
17 Oct 2025The petitioner, Mohan Dhotre, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the levy under the Maharashtra La...
- 149
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Contempt Proceedings — Impleadment of Sitting Judge Not Permissible in Suo Motu Contempt. Filing of Scandalous Application Against Judge Constitutes Fresh Contempt and Professional Misconduct.
20 Apr 2026The appellant, an advocate, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court on behalf of his client seeking a CBI inve...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Membership Dispute with Bangalore Turf Club Limited. Appellant Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Membership Under Club Rules and Order 39 CPC.
10 Nov 2021The appellant, Suraj Narredu, filed a suit (O.S.No.3797/2021) before the LXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a declarati...
- 350
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Customs Broker Licence Suspension Due to Delay in Submitting Inquiry Report. Interpretation of Regulation 20(5) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 — Whether Time Limit of 90 Days for Inquiry Report is Mandatory or Directory.
19 Apr 2018A group of customs appeals was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, against various customs broker licence holders before...
- 33
High Court
Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
23 Apr 2026The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.
26 Oct 2016The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.
26 Oct 2016The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes ICC Report in POSH Act Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant. Internal Complaints Committee's finding of sexual harassment set aside as inquiry conducted without adhering to principles of natural justice under Section 11 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, an employee of Akasa Air, was accused of sexual harassment by a female colleague (Respondent No. 3). An Internal Complaints Committee ...
- 181
