Search Results for "delay penalty"

1531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandeep, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Abdul Hameed on 30.10.1997. The prosecution alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Triple Murder Case Due to Lack of Reform Assessment and Circumstantial Evidence Gaps. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 201 IPC upheld but death penalty not warranted as possibility of reform not considered.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the conviction and death sentence of Vishwajeet Kerba Masalkar for the murder of his mother, wife, and two-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Discharges Appellant in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Active Instigation or Intent to Aid Suicide Found. Loan Recovery Harassment Without Proximate Link to Suicide Does Not Attract Section 306 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mahendra Awase against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had declined his discharge from cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...