Search Results for "core need"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "core need"

2380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2380 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Award Extending Benefits to Transferred Workmen — Protection of Service Conditions Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that workmen transferred from erstwhile Tomco and Lakme factories were entitled to extension of benefits under prior awards and settlements, and the Industrial Court's award was within the scope of the reference.

16 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Research Centre And FCU / Development Centre, challenged an award of the Industrial Court dated 30 November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — Reference to Arbitration Directed Under Section 64 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Dispute over compensation for acquired land referred to arbitration as per statutory mechanism, rejecting objections of limitation and maintainability.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Registrar's Order for Suo Motu Inquiry Under Section 83 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Application by Non-Member Cannot Trigger Inquiry. The Court held that an application for inquiry under Section 83 must be filed by at least one-third or one-fifth of the members, and a non-member's application cannot be treated as a valid basis for invoking suo motu powers.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Vithalnagar Cooperative Housing Society, challenged two orders dated 21.07.2010 and 27.07.2010 passed by the Divisional Joint Registra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR in Breach of Promise to Marry Case — Consensual Relationship Not Rape. Sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC if the promise is broken due to circumstances beyond control, and family members cannot be vicariously liable for rape under Section 376 IPC.

20 Jan 2016

The petitioners, including Bharat Devdan Salvi (Petitioner No.1) and his family members (Petitioners No.2 to 7), filed a Criminal Writ Petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR in Breach of Promise to Marry Case — No Offence of Rape Made Out as Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual Based on Promise of Marriage. Court holds that failure to marry due to incompatibility does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC or cheating under Section 417 IPC.

20 Jan 2016

The petitioners, including the main accused Bharat Devdan Salvi and his family members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

1 Jan 2026

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

3 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -- MOU Found Not Amenable to Specific Performance Due to Third-Party Litigation

24 Feb 2026

The High Court dismissed an Arbitration Petition challenging an Arbitral Award that rejected claims for specific performance of a Memorandum of Unders...

101 102 103 104 105

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)