Search Results for "unreliable evidence"

2468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by other witnesses.

The appellants, Ramesh Lasha Palva and Kashinath Lasha Palva, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Lahanu Jivya Palva under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 365 IPC set aside as sole identification by witnesses was doubtful and no independent corroboration of recovery of child.

The appellant, Aditya Sham Chaturvedi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bride Burning Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Prakash Mahadeo Ghorpade, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his sister-in-law, Gangabai, by setting her on fire. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Mohammad Umar Hafij, was convicted by the II Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of Najmunnisa under Section 302 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting son-in-law on fire set aside as dying declaration and witness testimony found unreliable.

The appellant, Nivrutti Bala Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his son-in-law, Babasaheb, by setting h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Wife Burning Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Pandit Dhondiba Khule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his wife Sadhna under Section 302 IPC an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Baban Waghe and Ramu @ Ramdas Budhya Waghe, original accused Nos. 3 and 4, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to provide consistent description and no independent corroboration of recovery.

The appellant, Rakesh Harilal Kahar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai on November 30, 2001, in Sessions Case No.250 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Identification by torchlight in darkness held insufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 452 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Indrabali Patai Rajbhar, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.524 of 2005 for offences ...