Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Retrenchment of Chaukidar by Public Works Department for Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Employer Failed to Pay Retrenchment Compensation at Time of Termination.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Industrial Court, Akola. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.5036/2014, Ganesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Employees' Contribution Deduction in Income Tax Case. Employees' contribution to PF/ESI/pension fund is deductible under Section 36(1)(va) only if paid before due date, not under Section 43B.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Insurance Compensation for Crop Loss Due to Pest Attack. Court holds that pest attack is not an insured peril under the Crop Insurance Scheme and that the petitioner failed to establish any legal duty or right to claim compensation.

The petitioner, Libaraj s/o Tulshiram Tikle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Exclusion of Assistant Superintendent from Justice Shetty Commission Benefits. Government Resolution dated 8.3.2013 and letter dated 30.10.2014 quashed to the extent they exclude the petitioner from pay revision benefits.

The petitioner, Amanulla Khan Pathan, an Assistant Superintendent of Civil Court (Junior Division), Deoni, filed a writ petition challenging a letter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Relief Orders in Service Disputes. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Vice-Chancellor filed four writ petitions (WP Nos. 2966/2011, 2967/2011, 2968/2011, 2969/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismissed as Bombay High Court Has No Territorial Jurisdiction.

The plaintiff, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the invocation of a Performance Bank Gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...