Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Against Husband in Suicide Abetment Case. Petitioner Contended That Victim's Depression and Video Statement Negated Instigation, Relying on Precedents Interpreting Section 306 IPC and Section 498A IPC.

The petitioner, the husband of the deceased, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Considers Appeals Against Quashing of SC/ST Liquor License Reservation Notification. Single Judge Quashed Notification as Discriminatory, State Appeals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, by this common order, addressed a batch of writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...