Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Eviction Decree in Sub-Lease Dispute for Breach of Covenant. Failure to pay municipal taxes and insurance premium constituted breach of condition under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, justifying forfeiture and eviction.

The petitioner, as lessor, had granted a sub-lease of land and buildings to the first respondent for 98 years. The sub-lease deed contained covenants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Specific Performance and Injunction. Sale Agreement with Full Payment and Possession Confers Equitable Right Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The plaintiff, Sarojini, filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated June 25, 2003, and for permanent injunction against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits of Ayurvedic Medical Officer - Petitioner Entitled to Higher Pay Scale and Full Pension, Gratuity with Interest. The court directed payment of retiral benefits with 6% interest from retirement date within three months.

The petitioner, Digambar Vitthal Gaikwad (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was appointed as a Medical Officer on 5 December 1978 holding t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings for Specific Performance — Decree Holder Entitled to Execute Decree Despite Judgment Debtor's Death. Order 22 Rule 12 CPC Provides That Execution Proceedings Do Not Abate by Reason of Death of Judgment Debtor.

The petitioner, Ashrafali, was the decree holder in O.S.No.38/2014 for specific performance of contract. The trial Court decreed the suit directing th...