Search Results for "Default bail"

1588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Right of Private Defence and Lack of Common Intention. The court held that the deceased was the aggressor and the appellants acted in self-defence, and the prosecution failed to prove common intention under Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Nandlal, Parshuram, and Sanjay Baviskar, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Lakhichand under Section 302 read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashanand Ramji Fulekar, was convicted by the 1st Additional Principal Judge and Special Judge (CBI) on 28.1.2009 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Harassment Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Demand for Money Not Proved to Be Dowry Demand.

The appeal was filed by Radhakisan Kachru Khandagale (appellant No. 1) and his father Kachru Raghunath Khandagale (appellant No. 2) challenging their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Impersonation and Forgery Case — Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity of Complainant. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 11.03.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Criminal Appeal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Smt. Usha Dhondiram Sarwade, a Casualty Medical Officer at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, was convicted by th...