CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011
24 Jan 2012The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 23-2-2010 (or 23-2-2011) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in S...
Search Results for "letter evidence"
8123 result(s) found
Found 8123 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.
14 Jun 2024The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Whether Affidavit Verification Can Bypass Examination Under Section 200 CrPC in Cheque Dishonour Cases under Section 138 NI Act. Reference Made to Reconcile Conflicting Views on Section 145 NI Act's Impact on Summary Trial Procedure.
7 Dec 2010The Bombay High Court was seized of a reference to a Full Bench arising from Criminal Writ Petition No. 2523 of 2010, filed by the accused (Chief Fina...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Domestic Worker, Dismisses Cross-Appeals. Testimony of Prosecutrix and Circumstantial Evidence Found Sufficient Under Section 376 IPC Despite Hostile Witness and No DNA Test.
8 Dec 2020The prosecution case involved a minor maid servant (Ms. X) who was employed by Accused No. 2 in Mumbai and was sexually assaulted by Accused No. 1, th...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decree for Lack of Valid Service of Notice Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court held that the landlord failed to prove valid service of statutory notice, and the appellate court's finding was perverse.
20 Dec 2010The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant, Mohanlal Soni, challenging the decree of eviction passed by the learned District J...
- 118
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.
21 Feb 2022The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.
26 Nov 2024The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...
- 876
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Unfair Trade Practice Case, Denies Specific Performance. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Due to Buyer's Default Under Clause 10 of Plot Buyer's Agreement.
7 Mar 2019The appellant, Sudha Gupta, filed an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restric...
- 250
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.
4 May 2012The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Mandamus to Re-erect Shed Demolished by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Establish Right to Re-erection After Demolition of Dilapidated Structure Without Proper Permission.
16 Aug 2005The petitioner, Shriram Ramphal Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus against the Mun...
- 132
