Division Bench of Bombay High Court Adjudicates Clubbed Writ Petitions Involving Revenue and Land Matters. Petitions Challenge Government Revenue Decisions Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "held"
44638 result(s) found
Found 44638 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Scope of Order XLI Rule 22 CPC in Second Appeal. Conditional Readiness to Perform Contract Held Not Sufficient; Respondent Cannot Challenge Adverse Finding Without Cross-Objection.
23 Feb 2005The case originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 17 August 1973 concerning immovable property. The plaintiff, V...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).
20 Dec 2019This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Petition for Termination of Standing Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Appointment of New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 11(6), 14(2), and 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Alleging Lack of Independence of Serving Railway Officer Arbitrators.
12 Dec 2019The petitioner, ITD Cementation India Ltd., a company engaged in construction and infrastructure, was awarded a contract by the respondent, Konkan Rai...
- 28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Elected Candidate in Office of Profit Disqualification Case. Special Government Pleader Appointment Under Order 27 Rule 8B CPC Held Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution, and Rajasthan Act 5 of 1969 Retrospectively Removed Disqualification.
16 Oct 1969This appeal arose from an election petition challenging the election of Kanta Kathuria to the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from the Kolayat constitu...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Corporation in Dismissal Case, Denying Reinstatement Despite Procedural Lapse. Employee Held Entitled Only to Damages as Contract of Personal Service Cannot Be Specifically Enforced; Breach of Regulation Did Not Violate Mandatory Statutory Obligation.
8 Sep 1969The case involved a dispute between an employee and his employer, a statutory corporation, regarding the employee's dismissal from service. The employ...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company and Managing Director for Foreign Exchange Violations. Complaint Invalid as Director of Enforcement Failed to Comply with Proviso to Section 23D(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act Requiring Finding that Penalty in Adjudication Proceedings Would be Inadequate; Prosecution Under Rule 132A Also Incompetent After Rule Was Omitted.
23 Jul 1969The Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, M.R. Pratap, appealed against a Madras High Court order that had dismissed their applicati...
- 29
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Stamp Duty on Agreement to Lease, Examining Impact of Deletion of Explanation III to Article 36 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958
14 Dec 2011These writ petitions were filed under Article 226 challenging orders of the stamp authorities demanding deficit stamp duty on agreements to lease exec...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Order in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court finds no misrepresentation in bid process and upholds arbitrator's order granting interim measures while imposing conditions on franchisee to protect BCCI's interests.
14 Dec 2010Background: The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Ja...
- 17
