Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

2003 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2003 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Interpretation of Sale Deeds. Appellate Court Erred in Construing Sale Deeds Dated 6-5-1897 and 5-3-1946, Leading to Wrong Conclusion That Plaintiff Was Not Owner of Entire Suit Land.

The case involves a property dispute over land Survey No. 32, Hissa No. 77, situated at village Kavathi, taluka Kudal. The original plaintiff, Sabaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Construction and Nuisance. Tenant's unauthorized permanent alterations and nuisance to other occupants justified eviction under Bombay Rent Act.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the landlord filed a suit for eviction of the tenant from the suit premises under Sections 12 and 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Husband's Encroachment on Government Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sau. Savitabai Sanjay Meshram, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Ashtgaon in 2007 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste woman....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Maintenance Order Under Domestic Violence Act. Concurrent Findings of Domestic Violence and Entitlement to Maintenance Under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Upheld.

The petitioner-husband challenged the judgment and order dated 22.01.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, which affirmed the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the appellants failed to prove exclusive title and possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Police Assistance for Possession in Property Dispute — Petitioner Must Pursue Civil Remedies for Trespass After Execution of Decree.

The petitioner, Pushpalata Gopal Worlikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application to Quash Cancellation of Bail in Assault Case — Cancellation Based on Gravity of Offence Without Violation of Bail Conditions Held Illegal. The court restored bail under Section 437(5) CrPC and alternatively granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.

The applicants, seven individuals, were accused in Crime No. 35 of 2011 registered at Shirasgaon Police Station, District Amravati, for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by College Director Challenging Reinstatement of Daily Wager — Termination Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Director of Shri Guru Govind Singhji College of Engineering and Technology, Vishnupuri, Nanded, challenged the judgment and order date...