Search Results for "Private property"

5694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Damages Suit Under Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Impliedly Barred. Section 7(4) of the Act Recognizes Concurrent Civil Remedy, Hence Suit for Damages Maintainable.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court which set aside a decree for damages in favor of the appellant, M. Har...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MPID Act Case — Quashes Attachment Order for Lack of Nexus with Crime. Property of Hotel Avion Private Ltd cannot be attached under Section 3 of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 without direct link to alleged default.

The appellant, Hotel Avion Private Ltd, filed two criminal appeals challenging the attachment of its property under the Maharashtra Protection of Inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Appellate Order Expunging Expert Evidence in Mesne Profits Suit. Order XX Rule 12 CPC and Bombay Amendment Govern Whether Past Mesne Profits Claim Required Specific Pleading and Whether Valuer's Evidence Was Relevant.

The litigation originated from T.E. & R. Suit No. 48/62 of 2009 filed by the petitioners (plaintiffs) against respondent No.1 and others seeking vacan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...