Search Results for "Distinct offences"

1227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proof of Debt. Security Cheque for Future Sponsorship Does Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Smt. Ranju Batra, proprietor of M/s Admark Incorporated, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent no. 1, Bhushan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against IAS Officer in Arms License Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. The court held that unexplained delay of 20 years and absence of valid sanction under Section 197 CrPC vitiate the prosecution.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Robert Lalchungnunga Chongthu @ R L Chongthu, an IAS officer of the Bihar Cadre, against the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

The appellant, Pandurang Ramchandra Ghorpade, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Vijay Gopala Lohar, in two separate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...