Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22028 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22028 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Quashing Labour Court Judgment Without Specific Remand. Industrial Court Cannot Remand Matters as a Matter of Routine Course Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Machindra Chandrabhan Dange, a labourer, filed a complaint before the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, alleging unfair labour practices. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Industrial Court’s Remand Order; Reinforces Fairness in Proportionate Punishment in Labor Disputes. Unfair Labor Practice in Dismissal Addressed under the Doctrine of Proportionality.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, examined a labor dispute where the petitioner, a former employee, contested his dismissal on the grounds of unfai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order for Ignoring Binding Precedent in Section 14A Disallowance Case. Tribunal's refusal to follow earlier decision of the same court on identical issue held to be a jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 September ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...