Search Results for "selection challenge"

1745 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1745 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Non-Signatory Principal Held Liable Based on Agency Relationship and Implied Consent.

The appeals arose from three arbitral awards passed in disputes relating to the construction of mustard seed processing and storage silos in Rajasthan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State of Maharashtra's Petition for SIT in CBI Probe Against Ex-Home Minister. The Petition Alleges Bias of CBI Director and Seeks Fair Investigation.

In a criminal writ petition, the State of Maharashtra sought constitution of a Special Investigation Team to monitor and take over the investigation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State of Kerala and Corporation in Abkari Workers Rehabilitation Case. Upholds High Court's Direction to Implement 2002 Government Order for Employment of Displaced Workers, Finding Modification Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The case involves appeals by the State of Kerala and Kerala State Beverages (M and M) Corporation Limited against a Division Bench judgment of the Ker...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...