Search Results for "negligence"

4132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved Despite Absence of Eye-Witness. Claimant entitled to compensation as rash and negligent driving established through documentary evidence and circumstances under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Nitin Narayanrao Magar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Carrying Sugarcane Workers Overturns Due to Negligence. Insurer Held Liable to Pay Compensation for 10% Permanent Disability Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., the original respondent No.3, challenging the judgment and award dated 11-01-2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — BEST Bus Driver's Negligence Proved. Tribunal's finding of involvement of bus and negligence upheld; compensation reduced from Rs.11,88,000 to Rs.10,38,000 with 7.5% interest.

The appeal was filed by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BEST Undertaking) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.7.2015 passed by the Claims Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Assistant Professor with Permanent Disability in Motor Accident. Loss of Earning Capacity and Future Prospects Considered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deepali, an assistant professor aged 33, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, seeking compensa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Under Essential Commodities Act for Non-Essential Commodities. Wheat and Rice Seized by Rationing Authorities Held Not Covered Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 or Control Orders.

The petitioners, including M/s. Ace International, Pankaj Pranjibhai Thakkar, and M/s. Metro International, filed three writ petitions challenging the...