Search Results for "expert witness"

1427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 308 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ayubkhan Khodadad Khan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for an offence punishable under Section 308 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal of Convicted Husband for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC. Appellant Challenges Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Testimony of Interested Witnesses.

The appellant, Syed Sahil @ Krishnamurthy, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife, Seema Thasleem, under Section 302 IPC. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will and Grants Probate Despite Challenge of Undue Influence and Physical Disability; Exclusion of Earlier Beneficiaries and Change of Solicitors Found Not to Vitiate Testamentary Capacity Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The proceedings originated from a probate petition filed by the three executors of the last Will and Testament of Adreshir Khurshedji Wadia, dated 8th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Insanity Defence Under Section 84 IPC and Burden of Proof Under Section 105 Evidence Act. The court held that insanity must be legal, not medical, to exempt from criminal liability, with the accused bearing the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities standard.

The judgment involved an appeal where the appellant raised the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, seeking reversal of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...