Search Results for "SAT"

1173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty or Instigation. Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant's conduct drove deceased to commit suicide.

The appellant, Anandrao s/o Janardan Hiware, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur on 13.9.2001 in Sessions Case No.150 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Baliram s/o Mansingh Chawhan, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No. 3/1998 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor. No 'Taking' Established Under Section 361 IPC as Minor Left Father's House of Her Own Free Will.

The appellants, Ashit s/o Adil Biswas, Madhav s/o Balram Gharami, and Suresh s/o Ramdas Bawankar (since abated), were convicted under Section 363 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Tax Collector in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Demand of Illegal Gratification for Issuing Tax Demand Notice Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Dayaram s/o Balram Kuthe, was a Tax Collector with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The complainant, Dharamraj Natthuji Madankar, cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Love Triangle Case. Life imprisonment confirmed under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 IPC for killing Sagar due to rivalry over Ayesha.

The case arises from the murder of Sagar, younger brother of PW-8 Santosh, on 30th June 2011. The deceased was in love with PW-12 Ayesha Mulla. Accuse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Suffered from Material Inconsistencies and Was Not Supported by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Fatima C. Fernandes, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of her mother-in-law, Angelina Fernandes, by setting her ablaze...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Abdul Ahad, Abdul Ashfak, and Abdul Akil, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Rambabu under Section 302 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Sudhakar Domaji Hazare and Prafulla @ Pravin Anandrao Sangidwar, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Doctor in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent and Unreliable Testimony of Prosecutrix. Allegations of Rape and Outraging Modesty Fail as Medical Evidence and Conduct of Prosecutrix Contradict Her Claims Under Sections 376, 354, 509, 506 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Arvind Kashinath Bondekar, a medical practitioner, for offences under Sections 376, 354, 50...