Search Results for "Central Board"

4990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Held Efficacious. Petitioners Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for Relief Against Recovery Actions.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by borrowers (Arun Dattatraya Narake and others) against the Authorized Officer of Kolhapur Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Expert Commission in Sewage Nuisance Case Against Municipal Council and Developer. The Court Held That Occupation Certificate Cannot Be Issued Without Sewerage Compliance, Recognizing Violations of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from a sewage nuisance caused to an agriculturist's land by a high-rise resident...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Direction Deleting Gram Panchayat from Co-operative Society's Area of Operation. Direction Issued Under Section 12(5) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act Allegedly Without Authority and in Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, directors of the Antarsante Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...