Search Results for "CBI investigation"

1080 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1080 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Passport Return Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 442 BNSS. Second Revision Barred Under Section 442(3) BNSS as Sessions Judge's Order Was Passed in Revision.

The appellant, Seesa Santosh, lodged a complaint on 12 October 2014 regarding the suspicious unnatural death of his father. An unnatural death case un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Discharges Former Collector in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Allegations of inflated literacy drive figures fail as court finds acts were in discharge of official duty requiring prior sanction.

The applicant, Prakash Murlidhar Bhishikar, a retired IAS officer, served as Collector of Buldhana between 1993 and 1996. He was assigned the work of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...