Search Results for "subsequent purchasers"

711 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 711 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Alternative Decree for Damages. Plaintiff's claim for specific performance of flat agreement dismissed due to subsequent sale to bona fide purchaser; alternative decree for damages against original vendor confirmed.

The judgment arises from two appeals against a common decree dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in Suit No.1642 of 1984. The original pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge in Cheque Dishonour Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Section 138 NI Act. No Interference Warranted as Magistrate's Order Based on Material Evidence.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Yogesh Premjibhai Suvariya and another (the petitioners/accused) challenging the order dated 08...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — High Court Erred in Reversing Concurrent Findings on Bona Fide Purchaser Defence. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Sections 41 and 52 interpreted; lis pendens applies to transfers during pendency of injunction suit.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 10.11.2002 for 16 kanals of land for Rs. 8 lakhs, with Rs. 2.50 l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...