Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...