KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "second FIR impermissible"
262 result(s) found
Found 262 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Suspension Order and KSAT Dismissal in Police Disciplinary Matter — Suspension Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Rule 10A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The court held that failure to review suspension within 90 days renders continued suspension invalid and directed reinstatement of the petitioner.
10 Mar 2025The petitioner, Sri Kishore Kumar B.K. (also referred to as Sri B.K. Kishore Kumar), a Police Inspector in the Internal Security Division (ISD) of Kar...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in IPC Sections 366A and 506 Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Shoddy Investigation. Conviction overturned as prosecution failed to prove case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions in testimonies, delay in FIR registration, and inadequate investigation under Sections 366A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
28 Jul 2020The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal by Parminder Kaur challenging her conviction under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, whi...
- 208
High Court
High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Malicious Prosecution Suit, Holds Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Prosecution Terminated After Supreme Court Dismissed Special Leave Petition. Appellate Court's Order Setting Aside Entire Trial Court Decree Set Aside for Conflict with Earlier High Court Order Dismissing Counterclaim Appeal.
3 May 2018The dispute arose from a police complaint filed by the respondent against the appellant alleging encroachment and forgery of a sale deed. The police i...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition for Interim Custody of Seized Articles and Cash in Corruption Case, Dismisses Quash Petition as Premature. The court held that the trial court's refusal to grant interim custody was not justified and that the quash petition was premature as investigation was ongoing.
24 Jan 2017The judgment concerns two connected petitions arising from Crime No.3/2016 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Tumakuru, against R. Umeshappa, an Exec...
- 51
High Court
- 28
High Court
- 34
High Court
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 49
