Search Results for "sealed container"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "sealed container"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

21 Jul 2026

The appellant, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for all...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Seizure of Industrial Oil by DRI Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — DRI Has Power to Seize Goods Even After Clearance for Home Consumption. The court held that the power of seizure under Section 110 is independent of assessment and can be exercised by DRI officers as proper officers.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by importers of industrial oil challenging the seizure of their goods by the Directorate of Reve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

5 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search of Bag Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate

19 Dec 2018

The appellant, Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the trial court for an offence under Section 8(c) read with Section 21(...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

2 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not Exigible to Tax Under Entry 82 of Schedule IV of KVAT Act, 2003. The court held that the product, being a mixture of dehydrated potato flakes and vegetables, does not fall under the specific taxing entry and is not exigible to tax.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.40521/2010 dated 10.02.2011. The respon...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)